Skip to main content

Are We Ignoring Our Body Clocks?

The body clock (or circadian rhythm) is a system of smaller cellular clocks that is responsible for our daily cycles, we have peaks and troughs in almost all aspects of our biology, including alertness and stress. This rhythm is tuned to the day/night cycle, and helps to make sure our bodies are prepared for the behaviours that are appropriate for that time of day eg becoming sleepy when it gets dark. 

However, recent research suggests that our 24/7 society is causing an increasing number of us to become out of sync with our natural rhythm and that this may be having adverse effects on our physical health and mental well-being.

All animals, in fact all cells as far as I'm aware, have an internal clock. these cellular clocks are controlled by a larger network of cellular clocks in the brain, called the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). this cluster of cells is kept in harmony by the day/light cycle. Using ancestral light receptors in our eyes called retinal ganglion cells, they detect light but aren't used for vision (we have other cells for that). The SCN sends signals to a lot of different regions of the brain, however one of the most important is the hypothalamus- which controls our hormone levels.

There are dozens and dozens of hormones, each controlling aspects of our bodies that result in subtle but important daily rhythms. For example, the sleep hormone melatonin is at it's peak during the dead of night and steadily drops until we reach the time we should wake up 9 (which is naturally around or a bit after sun rise). In contrast, adrenaline is at it's lowest during the night and peaks during the day– we also experience a brief burst of adrenaline just around the time we wake up to kick-start the body.





These daily rhythms help us to survive by making sure we are the most alert at the most stressful times of the day, making sure our organs run smoothly with our meal times and making sure we fall asleep at the right time. The BBC has a feature about body clocks that makes it easy to understand our daily rhythms, what is best to do at what time of day, and to see whether we are still in tune with our natural rhythms or not. 

We all have that temptation to skip on a couple of hours of sleep in order to get more stuff done during the day, especially if assignments or exams are coming up! But by doing this, you're not only not working at your best at the time, but the rest of the next day you'll be too tired to really work to the best of your ability. A rule of thumb I've seen thrown around is, for each extra hour you stay awake working, you lose 1–2 hours of quality thinking the next day. You're better off getting that extra sleep, waking up early and getting the job done when your brain is functioning much better. 

In order to make sure you are able to get the right amount of sleep at the right time, you might want to consider your "sleep hygiene". Do you use your phone in bed just before trying to go to sleep? Do you try and work all the way up until the last moment before going to bed, without taking the time to wind down? Is your room too bright, noisy, the wrong temperature? Do you drink caffeinated drinks in the afternoon/evening? All of these things and more can have an effect on your sleeping patterns and can disrupt your daily rhythms. 

So take a look and figure out how in tune you are with your natural daily cycles, and see how you can structure your daily routine to capitalise on these peaks and troughs throughout the day! There are 3 main ways that you can do this; do your hardest work between 9am and 12pm, exercise between 3pm and 6pm and try to sleep from 11:30pm to 8am. 


Sources and Further Reading

http://gladstoneinstitutes.org/node/11312
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-27161671
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circadian_rhythm
http://healthysleep.med.harvard.edu/image/200
http://www.neurology.org/content/71/8/594

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medical Writing: Do you need a PhD?

When I was looking into becoming a medical writer, I was just at the end of my MSc and trying to decide whether to try and get a job in medical communications or to do a PhD and then move into Med Comms later. The short answer is no you don't necessarily need  a PhD to be a medical writer, but some employers think you do and it certainly seems to be the ideal.  After looking around on the internet I found a few forum posts asking about the same thing, "should I do a PhD to get into Med Comms?”. Most people said no not necessarily. But as far as I could tell, all of them did have PhD’s and were just telling people well maybe yes and maybe no. Since getting a job as an associate medical writer without a PhD, I've heard a lot more of this conversation occurring within the industry and especially at careers fairs. A lot of people  do  have PhD’s and quite often post-doctoral experience. But that is normally because they started out in academia and then discovered medical w

A Moment of Clarity for Solar Power

There's something about solar energy that I just find fascinating. Maybe it's the because it could be our saviour and the key to practically endless free energy, or it could be that it's the mission to mimic one of life's most complex and fundamental biological processes (photosynthesis). Whatever it is, it's got me hooked!  That said, I am no physicist and I do not pretend to be one! What I am, though, is someone who is very interested in watching the technical advances in solar technology and who takes pleasure in telling the story of solar energy.  This article sparked from a conversation with one of my housemates about solar energy. We talked about  how solar energy could power california 5 times over without using up any additional space  and then went onto  the possibility of "paint-on solar power" . Then we got to talking about how cool it would be if we could have transparent solar cells, so you could replace your windows with "solar w