Skip to main content

Are Two Thirds of All Cancers Really Down to Chance?

You may have heard in the news that around two thirds of all cancers are due to chance, with lifestyle and genetics contributing the other third. However don't give up on those New Year's Resolutions and start on a diet of only four leaf clovers just yet! 


While a lot of mainstream science media have been saying this, the paper that these stories are based on is much less clear. Now as the paper is stuck behind a pay-wall that I don't have acces to myself, I'll have to point you to this excellent article that explains the true findings of the paper. For certain types of cancer, it appears that maybe more of the risk is contributed to by chance mutations rather than environment but in others there is an extremely high environmental risk. For example This paper suggests that smoking contributes about 75% of the risk for lung cancer.Lifestyle can still give you much more of a fighting chance of not only avoiding cancer, but also being able to overcome it if you are one of the unlucky ones. While the statistics aren't entirely clear, it is entirely logical that keeping your body in good condition by eating right, staying active and not smoking will give you the best chance of being able to cope with the effects of both cancer and the treatments (which can often be as if not more gruelling). However what I can explain is how random errors can contribute to cancer (something that the mainstream science media also didn't do very well). 


So how does cancer arise and why is it apparently so random? I've previously written a brief explanation of how cancer occurs here but essentially, every time the cells in your body divide (which most do on a fairly regular basis) they have to replicate their DNA. The process of cell division is very complex and it is still not yet known exactly how it works, but it is known that every cell division is not perfect, despite a number of mechanisms that try to cut down on the number of errors. These errors in DNA replication are mutations, most of which will not be of any consequence as approximately 70% of our DNA is "junk" DNA (ie it doesn't code for any proteins). However, if there is a mutation in a sequence of DNA that codes for a protein that regulates how a cell divides, or how it dies, or whether it stays in the same place or is able to freely move around the body that cell is on the way to becoming cancerous. 


Cell Replication is not 100% perfect


Now this happens far more often than the amount of cases of cancer, as there a number of mechanisms that help to prevent cells from going rogue, but sometimes these cells accumulate enough errors that it actually does become cancerous. Particularly if there is a mutation that then increases the likelihood of further mutations occurring, then these mutations can grow in number rapidly. This helps to explain why most cancers occur later in life, as there will have been more time for mutations to have accumulated (some are more likely to occur in childhood but that's a whole article in itself). 

Unfortunately you will need to have a subscription to Science in order to read the full article, but you can read the abstract and editor's summary here and you can read more about cell replication and DNA errors in this great article with some really fascinating images. 

If you have any questions or comments please leave them down below or ask me on twitter

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medical Writing: Do you need a PhD?

When I was looking into becoming a medical writer, I was just at the end of my MSc and trying to decide whether to try and get a job in medical communications or to do a PhD and then move into Med Comms later. The short answer is no you don't necessarily need  a PhD to be a medical writer, but some employers think you do and it certainly seems to be the ideal.  After looking around on the internet I found a few forum posts asking about the same thing, "should I do a PhD to get into Med Comms?”. Most people said no not necessarily. But as far as I could tell, all of them did have PhD’s and were just telling people well maybe yes and maybe no. Since getting a job as an associate medical writer without a PhD, I've heard a lot more of this conversation occurring within the industry and especially at careers fairs. A lot of people  do  have PhD’s and quite often post-doctoral experience. But that is normally because they started out in academia and then discovered medical w

#ThanksToVideoGames shows Twitter gaming community has a sincere side

National Video Games Day was Thursday 7th July, 2020. A day where people in the gaming community can reflect on what video games mean to them. For me, video games are a way of staying in touch with friends I no longer live close to and provides an escape from the everyday stresses of the world.  It's clear that I'm not the only one, with #ThanksToVideoGames making waves on Twitter, people from all over the world shared their own reasons to be grateful for having video games in their lives. My curiosity got the better of me; I wanted to find out more about why people were grateful for video games and I wanted to show people that (shockingly) gamers can also be very sincere online.  I created this visualisation of the most common words that appeared in tweets with #ThanksToVideoGames to show the different themes coming through in discussions on Twitter. Make sure you hit the full screen icon to show the full picture; you  c

Are We Ignoring Our Body Clocks?

The body clock (or circadian rhythm) is a system of smaller cellular clocks that is responsible for our daily cycles, we have peaks and troughs in almost all aspects of our biology, including alertness and stress. This rhythm is tuned to the day/night cycle, and helps to make sure our bodies are prepared for the behaviours that are appropriate for that time of day eg becoming sleepy when it gets dark.  However, recent research suggests that our 24/7 society is causing an increasing number of us to become out of sync with our natural rhythm and that this may be having adverse effects on our physical health and mental well-being. All animals, in fact all cells as far as I'm aware, have an internal clock. these cellular clocks are controlled by a larger network of cellular clocks in the brain, called the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). this cluster of cells is kept in harmony by the day/light cycle. Using ancestral light receptors in our eyes called retinal ganglion cells, they det