Skip to main content

Is it possible to record from single neurons with EEG?

Electroencephalography, or EEG, is a technique that has allowed scientists to take recordings of activity of large populations of neurons (the cells of the brain that communicate with each other electrically). EEG has furthered our understanding of sleep, enables us to make accurate diagnoses of conditions such as epilepsy, has given us a glimpse into how higher cognitive processes work and has provides the basis for brain-computer interfaces. 

It allows us to glimpse into the inner workings of the human mind without having to perform dangerous surgery, even babies are happy to have their brains recorded from with this equipment. However, whilst EEG is great at the moment for looking at the activity across large amounts of neurons (thousands to millions in fact) at an incredible time resolution. There is as yet no way of recording from single neurons in such a non-invasive way. Doing so might help us to uncover unimaginable amounts of new information about the workings of the human brain.

Even babies are happy to have their brains recorded from.

A recent study has aimed at making it possible to calculate the contribution of a single electric signal (or action potential) from a single neurone to the overall EEG signal. Essentially they averaged out a number of simultaneous EEG recordings of a specific region of macaque brains called the somatosensory cortex (where the brain processes the location of sensations) and correlated them with individual cell recordings. What they found was that for certain neurones there is a correlation with certain frequencies of EEG, however there are a number of confounding variables that make it difficult to be certain at this time. These variables include the type and size of neurones, their location, the amount of activity in neighbouring neurones and many more, which results in a vast amount of noise that is often greater than the contributions from the neurones in question. 

While this is a promising first step in being able to record from single cells non-invasively, it is important to note that we are far from being able to do this in real-time and that the authors are very careful not to overstate their claims.  These recordings were made in ideal conditions for this kind of experiment over thousands of repeats and then the data was analyzed afterwards to look for contributions from single neurones, however the findings here do agree with the predicted contributions calculated by simulations. Ultimately this and further studies may help to narrow the gap between the macroscopic recordings of EEG and microscopic recordings from single cells. 

If you want to read the paper there's a link to the manuscript here.
If you want to learn a little bit more about how EEG works you might find this video useful. 

Source:Bartosz Telenczuk, Stuart Bakerd, Richard Kempterc, Gabriel Curio. Correlates of a single cortical action potential in the
epidural EEG. Neuroimage; In press 2014 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.057.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medical Writing: Do you need a PhD?

When I was looking into becoming a medical writer, I was just at the end of my MSc and trying to decide whether to try and get a job in medical communications or to do a PhD and then move into Med Comms later. The short answer is no you don't necessarily need  a PhD to be a medical writer, but some employers think you do and it certainly seems to be the ideal.  After looking around on the internet I found a few forum posts asking about the same thing, "should I do a PhD to get into Med Comms?”. Most people said no not necessarily. But as far as I could tell, all of them did have PhD’s and were just telling people well maybe yes and maybe no. Since getting a job as an associate medical writer without a PhD, I've heard a lot more of this conversation occurring within the industry and especially at careers fairs. A lot of people  do  have PhD’s and quite often post-doctoral experience. But that is normally because they started out in academia and then discovered medical w

Are We Ignoring Our Body Clocks?

The body clock (or circadian rhythm) is a system of smaller cellular clocks that is responsible for our daily cycles, we have peaks and troughs in almost all aspects of our biology, including alertness and stress. This rhythm is tuned to the day/night cycle, and helps to make sure our bodies are prepared for the behaviours that are appropriate for that time of day eg becoming sleepy when it gets dark.  However, recent research suggests that our 24/7 society is causing an increasing number of us to become out of sync with our natural rhythm and that this may be having adverse effects on our physical health and mental well-being. All animals, in fact all cells as far as I'm aware, have an internal clock. these cellular clocks are controlled by a larger network of cellular clocks in the brain, called the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). this cluster of cells is kept in harmony by the day/light cycle. Using ancestral light receptors in our eyes called retinal ganglion cells, they det

#ThanksToVideoGames shows Twitter gaming community has a sincere side

National Video Games Day was Thursday 7th July, 2020. A day where people in the gaming community can reflect on what video games mean to them. For me, video games are a way of staying in touch with friends I no longer live close to and provides an escape from the everyday stresses of the world.  It's clear that I'm not the only one, with #ThanksToVideoGames making waves on Twitter, people from all over the world shared their own reasons to be grateful for having video games in their lives. My curiosity got the better of me; I wanted to find out more about why people were grateful for video games and I wanted to show people that (shockingly) gamers can also be very sincere online.  I created this visualisation of the most common words that appeared in tweets with #ThanksToVideoGames to show the different themes coming through in discussions on Twitter. Make sure you hit the full screen icon to show the full picture; you  c